Compare
Peter Fortune vs James McMurdock
A side-by-side comparison of voting participation, party rebellion, topic focus, and recent voting overlap.
Voting alignment
Peter Fortune and James McMurdock voted the same way 97% of the time, based on 198 shared comparable votes.
192 same votes
6 different votes
198 shared votes
Alignment only includes divisions where both MPs recorded an Aye or No vote. Tellers, absences, abstentions, and missing votes are excluded.
Topic alignment
Closest by topic
Most different by topic
Topic alignment uses local topic tags, so a division can count towards more than one topic.
Voting record
72.2%
same as average
Participation
41.4%
31% below average
426
590 eligible divisions
Total votes
244
590 eligible divisions
188
44.1% of votes cast
Aye votes
119
48.8% of votes cast
238
55.9% of votes cast
No votes
125
51.2% of votes cast
2
0.5% of votes cast
Against party
1
0.4% of votes cast
2 years, 3 months
Since 4 Jul 2024
Commons service
2 years, 3 months
Since 4 Jul 2024
Debates
123
+39.3 vs Commons average
Appearances
28
-55.7 vs Commons average
148
+2.1 vs Commons average
Contributions
33
-112.9 vs Commons average
Debate figures cover imported Hansard debate appearances from the last 12 months.
Financials and interests
£180,830
all imported IPSA years
Lifetime expenses
£171,670
all imported IPSA years
£180,830
20% below average
Latest expenses
£171,670
24% below average
4
4 registered categories
Registered interests
2
2 registered categories
0
matched sponsored bills
Sponsored bills
0
matched sponsored bills
Expenses use IPSA totals for financial year 2024-25. Sponsored bill counts depend on currently imported bill sponsor metadata.
Most active voting topics
Recent voting overlap
Where they voted differently
Where they voted the same
Member source
UK Parliament Members API
Voting source
Commons Votes API